Access Alert | New Judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union on Lawful Interception Obligations

Access Alert | New Judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union on Lawful Interception Obligations

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment on 16 March 2023 regarding the legal framework governing costs incurred by electronic communications providers when assisting law enforcement authorities with the lawful interception of communications.

Under Article 12 of the European Electronic Communications Code, the provision of electronic communications networks or services, excluding number-independent interpersonal communications services, may be subject only to a general authorisation. Article 13 further provides that the general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services may be subject only to the non-discriminatory, proportionate, and transparent conditions listed in Annex I of the Code, including enabling legal interception by competent national authorities.

In Italy, telecommunications companies are obliged to intercept communications (voice, computer, telematic, and data) upon a judicial authority’s request in exchange for a set fee. A national decree from 2017 imposed a reduction of at least 50% of the reimbursements of the expenditures associated with those interception activities by telecommunications providers. Italian telecommunications operators asked Italian judicial authorities to overturn that decree on the grounds that the fees set forth do not adequately offset the expenses incurred. The Italian Council of State subsequently asked the CJEU to clarify whether EU law guarantees full compensation for the costs that operators actually incurred to carry out such interceptions.

In Case C-339/21 Colt Technology Services and Others, the CJEU ruled that EU law does not require full reimbursement of the costs incurred as this is left to the discretion of individual Member States. EU law does not preclude national legislation that fails to require full reimbursement of the costs incurred by providers of electronic communications services when they enable the legal interception of electronic communications by the competent national authorities, provided that the legislation is non-discriminatory, proportionate, and transparent.

Access Partnership is closely monitoring lawful intercept developments. For more information, contact Chrystel Erotokritou, Compliance Manager, at [email protected].

Related Articles

The Practical Path Forward: Why Data Regulations 2.0 Must Be Built for Emerging Tech – And Fast

The Practical Path Forward: Why Data Regulations 2.0 Must Be Built for Emerging Tech – And Fast

This article is part of Access Partnership’s series ‘The New Privacy Playbook: Adapting to a Shifting Global Landscape’, which explores...

17 Jun 2025 Opinion
The Power of Light: Optical Links For Satellite Communications

The Power of Light: Optical Links For Satellite Communications

Making big waves in satellite communications, optical links, also known as Free-Space Optical (FSO) communication or laser communication, are transforming...

13 Jun 2025 Opinion
What Vietnam’s Political Transformation Means for Business Leaders

What Vietnam’s Political Transformation Means for Business Leaders

Vietnamese Communist Party General Secretary Tô Lâm and his administration are leading a streamlining of government that will fundamentally change the...

13 Jun 2025 Opinion
Access Alert: Ireland Launches SMS Sender ID Registry to Tackle Text Scams

Access Alert: Ireland Launches SMS Sender ID Registry to Tackle Text Scams

In 2022, Ireland recorded an alarming average of 1,000 fraud cases per day linked to scam calls and texts, with...

12 Jun 2025 Opinion