Access Alert | New Judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union on Lawful Interception Obligations

Access Alert | New Judgment from the Court of Justice of the European Union on Lawful Interception Obligations

The Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) issued a judgment on 16 March 2023 regarding the legal framework governing costs incurred by electronic communications providers when assisting law enforcement authorities with the lawful interception of communications.

Under Article 12 of the European Electronic Communications Code, the provision of electronic communications networks or services, excluding number-independent interpersonal communications services, may be subject only to a general authorisation. Article 13 further provides that the general authorisation for the provision of electronic communications networks or services may be subject only to the non-discriminatory, proportionate, and transparent conditions listed in Annex I of the Code, including enabling legal interception by competent national authorities.

In Italy, telecommunications companies are obliged to intercept communications (voice, computer, telematic, and data) upon a judicial authority’s request in exchange for a set fee. A national decree from 2017 imposed a reduction of at least 50% of the reimbursements of the expenditures associated with those interception activities by telecommunications providers. Italian telecommunications operators asked Italian judicial authorities to overturn that decree on the grounds that the fees set forth do not adequately offset the expenses incurred. The Italian Council of State subsequently asked the CJEU to clarify whether EU law guarantees full compensation for the costs that operators actually incurred to carry out such interceptions.

In Case C-339/21 Colt Technology Services and Others, the CJEU ruled that EU law does not require full reimbursement of the costs incurred as this is left to the discretion of individual Member States. EU law does not preclude national legislation that fails to require full reimbursement of the costs incurred by providers of electronic communications services when they enable the legal interception of electronic communications by the competent national authorities, provided that the legislation is non-discriminatory, proportionate, and transparent.

Access Partnership is closely monitoring lawful intercept developments. For more information, contact Chrystel Erotokritou, Compliance Manager, at [email protected].

Related Articles

Access Alert: Trump’s First Executive Orders

Access Alert: Trump’s First Executive Orders

Following his inauguration yesterday, President Trump has quickly moved to sign a series of executive orders, marking a decisive shift...

21 Jan 2025 Opinion
Viable Online Age Verification Technologies and the Implementation of Age-Restricted Social Media Legislation

Viable Online Age Verification Technologies and the Implementation of Age-Restricted Social Media Legislation

Australia’s Parliament amended its Online Safety regulations[1] and on 10 Dec 2024 banned children under 16 from using social media...

21 Jan 2025 Opinion
Understanding How AI Impacts Jobs and Skills in ASEAN

Understanding How AI Impacts Jobs and Skills in ASEAN

The rapid adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) and generative AI (GAI) is accelerating the change in the skills needed for...

17 Jan 2025 Opinion
Digitalisation Driving Trade Amid Constraints

Digitalisation Driving Trade Amid Constraints

In a world increasingly anxious about restricted global trade, digitalisation stands out as a quiet driver. Digitalisation is not just...

15 Jan 2025 Opinion