Five Eyes Communiqué Heralds Potential Reigniting of Crypto Wars

Some institutions in The Five Eyes countries have always wanted to weaken cryptography, but others have stood as a bulwark against them. As political pressure to undermine encryption grows, will they reignite the Crypto Wars?

The Five Eyes countries (Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the US) met in Canada in late June to discuss national security issues, particularly related to domestic terrorism. In light of the recent WannaCry ransomware attacks, encryption inevitably came up.

The Ministerial Communiqué contained language that could be troubling, and bears witness to an erosion of previous positions championed by the US Government. Previously, the NSA had affirmed that strong cryptography does more benefit to security than harm. This time, the communiqué noted that “that encryption can severely undermine public safety efforts.” While the commitment by the member states to cooperate with industry to find solutions, rather than driving top down regulations, is laudable, it represents a potentially damaging change.

Some Five Eyes law enforcement and national security organizations have always wanted to read their citizen’s mail, but the NSA has traditionally been a bulwark against this impulse. NSA’s rationale was that strong cryptography protected citizens better than the government can, and that the protections were better than offensive capabilities. Given former FBI Director James Comey’s assertion that 2017 could provide an opening for a renewal of the cryptography debate, this should have privacy aficionados and industry worried.

Academics and industry have consistently asserted that back doors, key escrow, or “golden keys” would erode privacy, reduce security, and hurt the ICT industry for limited gains by law enforcement. Recent leaks of sensitive CIA and NSA cyber tools reduce confidence that governments could be trusted to safeguard these cryptography-breaking tools as well.  Further, if mass market, US-based solutions like iMessage, WhatsApp, or Skype were to give law enforcement access to all data, foreign providers from privacy-friendly jurisdictions or home-brewed systems would fill the needs of criminals and terrorists.

This would have the same effect as taking the locks off normal citizens’ doors, while criminals would fashion their own or acquire them in other markets.

Related Articles

WHO Members Finalise Draft Proposal for Pandemic Agreement

WHO Members Finalise Draft Proposal for Pandemic Agreement

Members of the World Health Organization finalised the draft proposal for the WHO Pandemic Agreement in Geneva on Wednesday. The...

17 Apr 2025 Opinion
Digital Transformation: Modernising Government IT Systems

Digital Transformation: Modernising Government IT Systems

This opinion piece is part of Access Partnership’s  ‘A Digital Manifesto’  initiative, which recommends a framework to develop US global leadership on...

15 Apr 2025 General
Strengthening AI Skills Development under the AI Action Plan

Strengthening AI Skills Development under the AI Action Plan

This opinion piece is part of Access Partnership’s  ‘A Digital Manifesto’  initiative, which recommends a framework to develop US global leadership on...

3 Apr 2025 Opinion
Securing the Internet: A Conversation with Chris Locke, Internet Society Foundation

Securing the Internet: A Conversation with Chris Locke, Internet Society Foundation

Join Lim May-Ann, Director of Multilateral Relations, Data Policy, and Partnerships at Access Partnership, and special guest Chris Locke, EVP...

31 Mar 2025 Opinion