Prepared by John Ure, Associate Professor and Director of the Telecommunications Research Project, the University of Hong Kong.
The reasons, aims, and results of policy-making often do not equate with one another. Reasons reflect current economic and political priorities of the state, while aims reflect outcomes that are often idealized for current political consumption, whereas results reflect the harsh realities of the times. This is just as true for policies of privatization as for any other.
Download the paper here
Photo by Dayne Topkin
Lead, Strengthen, and Prepare for the Future The new US Administration should make US global leadership on digital policy a...
Generative AI is no longer a future concept – it’s already reshaping how organisations operate, enabling employees to spend less...
Indonesia’s financial services sector stands at a critical inflection point. While cloud technologies offer unprecedented opportunities for innovation, efficiency, and...
Generative AI has quickly become one of the most transformative technologies of our time. With its ability to process vast...