Prepared by John Ure, Associate Professor and Director of the Telecommunications Research Project, the University of Hong Kong.
The reasons, aims, and results of policy-making often do not equate with one another. Reasons reflect current economic and political priorities of the state, while aims reflect outcomes that are often idealized for current political consumption, whereas results reflect the harsh realities of the times. This is just as true for policies of privatization as for any other.
Download the paper here
Photo by Dayne Topkin
As Sub-Saharan Africa races to close its mobile coverage gaps, national roaming has emerged as a tempting technical and policy solution....
The transformative potential of Artificial Intelligence (AI) cannot be realised without comprehensive, resilient, and secure digital connectivity. As AI continues...
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical vulnerabilities in global healthcare supply chains. In response, this initiative, led by the National Center...
The UK government’s forthcoming spending review will be a clear indication of the government’s commitment, revealing through its funding allocations...