Prepared by John Ure, Associate Professor and Director of the Telecommunications Research Project, the University of Hong Kong.
The reasons, aims, and results of policy-making often do not equate with one another. Reasons reflect current economic and political priorities of the state, while aims reflect outcomes that are often idealized for current political consumption, whereas results reflect the harsh realities of the times. This is just as true for policies of privatization as for any other.
Download the paper here
Photo by Dayne Topkin
As trade volume and importance grow across APEC, improving efficiency has become critical to sustaining trade growth. One key solution?...
The global economy today has become digital-centric, with virtually every type of stakeholder increasingly reliant on digital activities and platforms...
Lead, Strengthen, and Prepare for the Future The new US Administration should make US global leadership on digital policy a...
Generative AI is no longer a future concept – it’s already reshaping how organisations operate, enabling employees to spend less...