Prepared by John Ure, Associate Professor and Director of the Telecommunications Research Project, the University of Hong Kong.
The reasons, aims, and results of policy-making often do not equate with one another. Reasons reflect current economic and political priorities of the state, while aims reflect outcomes that are often idealized for current political consumption, whereas results reflect the harsh realities of the times. This is just as true for policies of privatization as for any other.
Download the paper here
Photo by Dayne Topkin
อ่านบทความนี้เป็นภาษาไทย A doctor in Bangkok analyzes medical images with AI, leading to a faster, more accurate diagnosis for her patient....
While physical retail remains popular, the cross-border e-commerce market has experienced remarkable growth, with global retail e-commerce sales more than...
Unlocking the future: The impact of AI on industry, society, and policy AI is transforming the way we live, work,...
Vietnam’s economic development journey has been impressive. From one of the world’s lowest-income countries, Vietnam has risen to become a...