Prepared by John Ure, Associate Professor and Director of the Telecommunications Research Project, the University of Hong Kong.
The reasons, aims, and results of policy-making often do not equate with one another. Reasons reflect current economic and political priorities of the state, while aims reflect outcomes that are often idealized for current political consumption, whereas results reflect the harsh realities of the times. This is just as true for policies of privatization as for any other.
Download the paper here
Photo by Dayne Topkin
Access Partnership and the International University of Japan’s Centre for Global Communications (GLOCOM) Release Economic Study on Enhancing Mobility in...
The economic impact of establishing a Google Cloud Region in South Africa Our analysis finds that having a Google Cloud...
For French Polynesia and other similar small island developing states, connectivity has always been a challenge. With a small national...
India has a bold, transformational vision for 2047, which will be driven by AI India envisions becoming a USD 30...