Prepared by John Ure, Associate Professor and Director of the Telecommunications Research Project, the University of Hong Kong.
The reasons, aims, and results of policy-making often do not equate with one another. Reasons reflect current economic and political priorities of the state, while aims reflect outcomes that are often idealized for current political consumption, whereas results reflect the harsh realities of the times. This is just as true for policies of privatization as for any other.
Download the paper here
Photo by Dayne Topkin
Access Partnership estimated the economic impact arising from establishing a Google Cloud Region in Qatar, based on a new methodology....
On 25 April – three days before the legislative summer recess – Congress introduced the long-awaited cybersecurity bill. Totalling 92...
Var Shankar weighs in on regulation and the responsible deployment of AI In the latest episode of Access Partnership’s Global...
As the data economy grows, every economic sector’s reliance on accessing and utilising data increases. However, restrictions placed on data...