Prepared by John Ure, Associate Professor and Director of the Telecommunications Research Project, the University of Hong Kong.
The reasons, aims, and results of policy-making often do not equate with one another. Reasons reflect current economic and political priorities of the state, while aims reflect outcomes that are often idealized for current political consumption, whereas results reflect the harsh realities of the times. This is just as true for policies of privatization as for any other.
Download the paper here
Photo by Dayne Topkin
With the largest Internet population in Latin America and the fourth-largest market for app adoption globally, Brazil is an established...
In an era where AI increasingly influences every aspect of society, the need for responsible and ethical practices has become...
The global economy has undergone exponential growth in recent years, fueled in part by a surge in app usage and...
Increasing regulatory harmonisation drives efficiencies by conserving public resources, attracting investment, and combating corruption. Furthermore, harmonisation efforts in the medical...