Prepared by John Ure, Associate Professor and Director of the Telecommunications Research Project, the University of Hong Kong.
The reasons, aims, and results of policy-making often do not equate with one another. Reasons reflect current economic and political priorities of the state, while aims reflect outcomes that are often idealized for current political consumption, whereas results reflect the harsh realities of the times. This is just as true for policies of privatization as for any other.
Download the paper here
Photo by Dayne Topkin
For French Polynesia and other similar small island developing states, connectivity has always been a challenge. With a small national...
India has a bold, transformational vision for 2047, which will be driven by AI India envisions becoming a USD 30...
Lead, Strengthen, and Prepare for the Future The new US Administration should make US global leadership on digital policy a...
The growing demand for products ordered via e-commerce globally, coupled with regional developments in ASEAN such as the Regional Comprehensive...