US Proposes Tariffs On USD 50 Billion of Chinese Goods

The US Trade Representative (USTR) yesterday released its proposed list of Chinese products that would be subject to a 25% tariff. The action further escalates trade tensions between China and the United States.

The US Trade Representative (USTR) yesterday released its proposed list of Chinese products that would be subject to a 25% tariff. The Federal Register notice confirms that USTR has found that China’s forced technology transfer policies are “unreasonable and discriminatory” under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, an investigation that USTR initiated in August 2017.

The action further escalates trade tensions between China and the United States. The current dispute kicked off on 22 March when President Trump signed a Presidential Memorandum calling for tariffs on Chinese goods, as well as restrictions on Chinese investment in the United States and a new challenge to Chinese practices at the WTO.

The 1377 individual category of goods that would be subject to US tariffs span a range of industries. While the Trump Administration previously made clear that it would target high technology products and sectors supported by the “Made in China 2025” industrial strategy, only some consumer technology products made the final cut. These include some monitors, televisions, displays and their associated parts, some hard drives and memory devices, and computer parts. Most products tend to be intermediate goods, rather than finished goods, and most seriously impact sectors such as manufacturing, machinery, mining, and healthcare.

Despite the shock value, it could take some time before tariffs are imposed. The notice from USTR begins a consultation period that will last for nearly two months, including a public hearing on 15 May. While USTR could make a final determination of what goods to sanction as soon as late May, it could delay that decision until August 2018, and could delay applying those tariffs until February of 2018, if it so chooses. This legal flexibility will give the Trump administration the latitude to continue negotiating with China. Previous reports have indicated that the two governments are currently discussion possible trade concessions and expanded market access in order to avert a full-scale trade war.

As anticipated, Chinese officials have still reacted sternly. The Chinese embassy in Washington issued a statement shortly after the release: “Such unilateralistic and protectionist action has gravely violated fundamental principles and values of the WTO… It serves neither China’s interest, nor US interest, even less the interest of the global economy.” In Beijing, the Ministry of Commerce has stated that it “strongly condemns and firmly opposes” the proposed US tariffs and will… “soon take measure of equal intensity and scale against US goods.”

Further reading: US and China Inch Towards Trade War

Author: Logan Finucan

Related Articles

Access Alert | Canada’s Public Consultation on a Modern Regulatory Framework for Space

Access Alert | Canada’s Public Consultation on a Modern Regulatory Framework for Space

The Canadian Space Agency (CSA) has launched a public consultation on various aspects of the Canadian national space regulatory framework....

1 Feb 2023 Opinion
Brazil and the Future of Democracy in the Age of Disinformation

Brazil and the Future of Democracy in the Age of Disinformation

Fake news is far from new. That said, digital tools such as social media and online bots have changed the...

25 Jan 2023 Opinion
GDPR: Is it still fit for purpose? 

GDPR: Is it still fit for purpose? 

The EU’s landmark General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) has fundamentally changed how personal privacy is respected and protected. However, cracks...

25 Jan 2023 Opinion
Access Alert | Environmental Footprint and Data Collection by ARCEP

Access Alert | Environmental Footprint and Data Collection by ARCEP

The impact of the deployment of electronic communications networks, mass production of terminals, operation of data centres, and ever-expanding data...

23 Jan 2023 Opinion